Indeed. I'd like to see 10% as a requirement for 3 stars or for even being sorted.I wish classification formula is changed to require 5%
That's exactly how it is now.why not just remove the stars and give +, =, or -
color + with green, = with yellow and - with red.
then you just get a visual warning that you're getting equal trade, better than equal or less than equal.
you decide whether that's ok or not and if you want to accept
Browser version , hover on *,**,*** , shows % , but its really whacko on cross trades ....Actually, showing the % instead of stars might be an improvement. Especially if it's rounded down to the closest 1%
That way in order to even show up as more than a 100% trade you'd need to offer at least 1,010 for 1,000
That's exactly how it is now.
Replacing
*, **, ***
with
-, =, +
doesn't change a thing.
The whole point is that a +0.1% trade should not be ranked the same as a +10% offer. Under your adjustment, they'd both be marked "+"
Edit: Actually, showing the % instead of stars might be an improvement. Especially if it's rounded down to the closest 1%
That way in order to even show up as more than a 100% trade you'd need to offer at least 1,010 for 1,000
Actually a +10% trade is offered above a 0.01% trade.That's exactly how it is now.
Replacing
*, **, ***
with
-, =, +
doesn't change a thing.
The whole point is that a +0.1% trade should not be ranked the same as a +10% offer. Under your adjustment, they'd both be marked "+"
Edit: Actually, showing the % instead of stars might be an improvement. Especially if it's rounded down to the closest 1%
That way in order to even show up as more than a 100% trade you'd need to offer at least 1,010 for 1,000
Edit: Actually, showing the % instead of stars might be an improvement. Especially if it's rounded down to the closest 1%
That way in order to even show up as more than a 100% trade you'd need to offer at least 1,010 for 1,000
As for the ratio that shows when you hover over the stars in the browser, the description on that is still misleading. Telling me that getting 100 more crystal than the scrolls I'm giving up is "far" better is a bit outlandish when we're talking about high numbers. Absolutely true if you're talking about asking for 100 scrolls and offering 200 crystal; not so accurate when we're talking about 5000 scrolls for 5100 crystal. (2.0 ratio v 1.02 ratio)
Yes, but both are 3 stars.Actually a +10% trade is offered above a 0.01% trade.
No matter how many stars you add there will always be a complaint that it would not be granular enough.Yes, but both are 3 stars.
So if only one of them is up today, and the other up tomorrow they are ranked (starred) equally.
The "ranking" system only has 4 possibilities: 1,2,3,0 stars. If there was a 1-10 star system it would be too big for the interface, so IMO the 0-4 star system could/should be tweaked to better represent "good" and "bad" trades.
Maybe. That doesn't mean it couldn't be better.No matter how many stars you add there will always be a complaint that it would not be granular enough.
No matter how many stars you add there will always be a complaint that it would not be granular enough.
Browser version , hover on *,**,*** , shows %
It shows the ratio, so a perfect 2 star from T1 to T3 shows as 2.25. Which defeats the purpose to showing what is called a fair trade. (Please, let's not get into what 'fair' means.)but its really whacko on cross trades ....
This sound better than stars. However, cross tier trades need to take into account the defined 'fair' trade ratios between the tiers.Actually, showing the % instead of stars might be an improvement. Especially if it's rounded down to the closest 1%
It has nothing to do with the math for me.So, what is being asked for? do we really need Inno to bare down all the facts and explain to us exactly what we should take or not, because we can't figure the math or worth in our own heads & minds?
Basically, up to +9.9% should all be 2 stars and sorted together. Offering 10% above a 1:1 ratio should be the threshold for becoming a top featured listing.
Nah, only rounds against you.conversely if you use that same math,and logic, wouldnt the 1star trades that are still within the 9% also still rate as 2 stars?
Yep, and I'm good with that.hm. by that math tho, you're basically punishing someone for making a better than even trade that isnt "good" enough for your standard.
playing Devil's Advocate here… what we know is that the current system clearly indicates a plus/minus/equal trades.
What it also offers is a hover for percentage on the desktop version.
So, it's easy to see a) you're getting more or less an equal, more than equal or less than equal trade.
Based on your specific needs, any of them may be "fair" or acceptable.
So, what is being asked for? do we really need Inno to bare down all the facts and explain to us exactly what we should take or not, because we can't figure the math or worth in our own heads & minds?