Yeah, we got that. You've stated your opinion blah blah blah. What you still don't seem to understand is that you don't speak for everyone.
You really seem to have a problem with people disagreeing with you. I do not claim to speak for everyone. YOU are the one claiming I do so, without even a single shred of evidence. I never claimed to do so. Not anywhere, in any post, in any forum for any game.
So I dare you to show me one quote of mine doing so, or retract this as I really don't care for such claims from you.
LOL. Every single facet of the game involves competition between users or Fellowships. Just because you can't have a direct impact on someone else's city doesn't mean it's not competitive.
Simply not true.
Interaction is possible, but there is no way to boycot players, attack them or harm them or even delay them the tiniest bit, though there are some ways in which one can help others. But that is a choice, not a requirement. Me taking trades, giving NH, or not doing so does not hinder anyone. It can benefit, but not hinder. That already makes it less of a competition.There is no scarcity of resources one has to compete for.
It isn't as if you cannot get to provinces I've completed. It's not as if one has to get resources from the world-map and it's a race to get them. It's not as if you cannot do a tourney province I already completed if we're neighbours. What you produce or not is entirely up to you and there is nothing any other player can do to limit you in that. How many provinces you do in a tourney is up to your own resources and style of play. Nothing I can do can influence that negatively, though one can sponsor it by trading goods. That however makes it less of a competition, not more.
As far as it is a competition, that purely exists in the mind of the player. YOU may feel it is a competetion. And I know there are a lot of players who do. I've known several. However, there are a lot of players who chose this game precisely because it is not competetive and contains no PvP element.
There are very few competetive elements to the game. The ranking points, the tourney ranking, the event ranking. But those are elements of the game, not the definition of the game, nor the defining factor of the game. And again, how well you do in them is in no way influenced by other players trying to hinder you.
Again... LOL. Explain how you'd get 600,000 AW ranking points in a little over a year by any other means. I'll wait.
See the one below. But basically, throwing money at the game is one way. Using spells to boost production is another. Especially when combined with intensive tourney play. I've known 2 Russians for instance who played competetively to do about 50 provinces each week. 50 provinces a week means 68 kps, +11 kps/province for provinces 9 and up, so 68=(39x11)=497 kps/week from the tourney alone, not counting the KP instants from the chests.
Of course, 600.000 in one year does seem excessive and rather impossible during normal play. But so far that's an unsubstantiated claim. Your claims go up each time you post. First it was everyone over 100.000 rp in AWs who you assumed to cheat. Now you claim someone added 600.000 rp in one year. What is it going to be tomorrow? The fact you claim I said I speak for everyone while I've never done so does not exactly help me believe this particular claim.
Already proven. Reading comprehension isn't your strong point.
No, NOT proven. Comprehensive reading obviously is not your strong point, to quote someone. PROVE to me that someone did not pay a few thousand dollars to buy those KPs, then PROVE that they have not been running MM spells pretty much all the time until they all were maxed to boost goodsproduction to buy KPS that way.
You make an assumption. I will grant it is suspicious, very suspicious even, but you have not proven anything. I told you in my last post that unless you have access to the financial records and the amounts of goods used to buy kps you have a suspicion. A suspicion, no matter how strong, is not proof.
Dear forum visitor,
It looks as though you have not registered for a forum account, or are not signed in. In order to participate in current discussions or create new threads, you will need to register for a forum account by clicking on the link below.
