Sorry, but I don't understand your question. Players who fail to fulfill clear requirements should be warned, right? What difference does it make whether or not they also play in other worlds?
Are they in a fellowship with you in the other worlds also or just in the one where they are slacking? If just the one, follow the fellowship rules and kick them out if they do not improve. If you share other fellowships with them, that is more sensitive and good luck figuring it out without getting them upset enough to quit all your fellowships.
What is the rank of the slacker in your fellowship? If they are not a Mage, you could always have a private talk between AM and Mages and see how everyone else feels.
@Myne then the question is, is this player in your fellowship also in other fellowships with some of the other players in yours? If they have friendships with other players to the point they share multiple fellowships together, then if you are the AM, you have to be delicate with how you handle things or you may lose more than that one slacker.
It depends on the person. I think you should find the right people, who are available and/or willing to contribute.have you found that the number of cities they play interferes with how they contribute to your fellowship?
It depends on the person. I think you should find the right people, who are available and/or willing to contribute.
I don't think I can run a fellowship successfully but as a commoner I try to contribute as much as the others in every of the three worlds I play in.
Bottom line, I think you should follow crackie's advice.the term commoner doesn't fit you.
Simple. Don’t have rules if you don’t plan to enforce them. There is no point to have minimums and then not do anything about people who don’t meet them. If you pick and choose who you enforce on, you are playing favorites. If you don’t enforce at all, you send a msg to your players they are free to flaunt them. This will affect overall group culture in a degrading manner if you are trying to run a competitive group. You won’t be able to attract A-level talent when you have C-level talent skating by below bare minimum. They will simply chose to leave and play elsewhere. Players doing their mins will prob also build resentment towards the slackers so now you add an underlayer of disgruntled teammates bubbling under the surface. Either way, you create more problems for yourself. Of course, RL emergencies arise to allow for exceptions. I give my team transparency reports to let them know who in the group has stuff going on so the rest of the team knows why they may be under-performing certain weeks. I keep that as general or specific as appropriate to maintain sense of privacy to the party affected.
In the end, it all goes back to finding a fellowship that fits the playing style. If you are a casual FS, slackers will not be an issue. If you are a competitive FS, why are you clinging onto slackers? They are not the right fit. I play competitively so I recruit people with right attitude and don’t care about their chapter or rank. I’d rather have 15 players than a full squad of 25 if it means I need to carry 10 players that doesn’t fit our culture. I will privately send msgs to under-performers but I am not hesitant at all to drop kick. I played in FS where AM won’t do anything and everyone complained to me about it. Not repeating that experience on my own ship!
Oh I plan on taking action. Just was looking for some options as to how. I dislike drama in the fellowship. I agree that if nothing is done, there will be resentment from the ones who have stepped up.
Edit: It's a lousy 500 pts in tourney. I am about to believe that they don't believe I will can them.