ajqtrz
Chef - Loquacious One
Since June 18th there have been only 4 threads receiving posts in The Lounge. I'm not surprised as the list of things you can't talk about are pretty thin. And the fact that those 4 threads are, essentially, games, means the idea that you can talk about what you want to talk about is pretty much, in my opinion, not true.
Over time I've attempted to put up posts to start conversations about communication, in particular, and some of them have received considered and valuable replies. But, I suspect, most people are not enamored with discussions of communication and it's uses and abuses, but are very much invested in discussions of other things..... of which we cannot speak.
So if you wonder why the forum is pretty much slow to dead, think about the range of subjects about which we are allowed to address and you can pretty easily see, we have nothing of which to talk about that interests us.
In my mind a forum is a place to get to know others and build relationships. Banning the most important subjects to people is probably not the best way to help them get to know each other. And it's certainly not helpful in having a vibrant and dynamic forum. In the end I suspect keeping the forum a quiet place is part of the strategy. If you keep people from speaking of anything remotely controversial you keep things quiet and need a lot less moderation. And since moderation costs -- even if the moderators aren't paid somebody has to train them, recruit them, and work with them -- it's likely that, too, goes into the mix of what you allow or not.
Finally, since it's on my mind, I don't know the answer. If you widen the scope of subjects allowed, you risk a free-for-all as there are a few people who cannot discipline themselves to engage in a polite and civil discourse about things they feel strongly. Or you invest a lot more in forum moderation and deal with more "feisty" players one on one.
So this is a lament to a nearly dead forum.
AJ
Over time I've attempted to put up posts to start conversations about communication, in particular, and some of them have received considered and valuable replies. But, I suspect, most people are not enamored with discussions of communication and it's uses and abuses, but are very much invested in discussions of other things..... of which we cannot speak.
So if you wonder why the forum is pretty much slow to dead, think about the range of subjects about which we are allowed to address and you can pretty easily see, we have nothing of which to talk about that interests us.
In my mind a forum is a place to get to know others and build relationships. Banning the most important subjects to people is probably not the best way to help them get to know each other. And it's certainly not helpful in having a vibrant and dynamic forum. In the end I suspect keeping the forum a quiet place is part of the strategy. If you keep people from speaking of anything remotely controversial you keep things quiet and need a lot less moderation. And since moderation costs -- even if the moderators aren't paid somebody has to train them, recruit them, and work with them -- it's likely that, too, goes into the mix of what you allow or not.
Finally, since it's on my mind, I don't know the answer. If you widen the scope of subjects allowed, you risk a free-for-all as there are a few people who cannot discipline themselves to engage in a polite and civil discourse about things they feel strongly. Or you invest a lot more in forum moderation and deal with more "feisty" players one on one.
So this is a lament to a nearly dead forum.
AJ