oh wise one

[Henroo]

I just noticed I am now listed as "oh wise one" instead of "well-known member." I am not complaining. I was just wondering what the criteria was to be a wise one? Having to ask would seem to indicate that I not actually that wise. Or does questioning one's wisdom prove that one is in fact wise? LOL

 

[Myne]

No idea. But I got the moniker too. I asked about it but no one answered on the forum.

 

[Pheryll]

Having to ask would seem to indicate that I not actually that wise. Or does questioning one's wisdom prove that one is in fact wise?

Sounds like your real name is Socrates.

 

[Enevhar Aldarion]

There used to be a list somewhere around here that showed how many posts were required to change from one title to the next and now I can't find it.

 

[StarLoad]

Actually, I have noticed several members that have new titles. One must wonder

 

[Pheryll]

I guess moderators are changing titles to note forum behavior/activity. I am not that far behind in total posts, but I post less frequently currently.

 

[StarLoad]

I guess moderators are changing titles to note forum behavior/activity. I am not that far behind in total posts, but I post less frequently currently.

I hope its not on behavior with all the shenanigans going on.... right @crackie and @muffy.

 

[Katwick]

I was just wondering what the criteria was to be a wise one? Having to ask would seem to indicate that ...

Maybe they're setting expectations?

 

[StarLoad]

Maybe they're setting expectations?

Looks like you got one too @Katwick

 

[Pheryll]

@Darielle has three. I think chef is a participation in the baking forum contest.

 

[Astram]

@Darielle has three. I think chef is a participation in the baking forum contest.

Her 3 are from the contest, for being a Scroll Keeper and a Buddy Fan

 

[muffy.]

LOL

 

[ajqtrz]

I think it's in response to the new "fact checking" site, "Gamitico." They check all the "facts," like "lvl 13 sanctuaries give out 1 million goods per every 36 hours" and "fairies are harder than dwarves" to insure everybody gets the "right" answer to anything posted. Of course, being of the "other" party all my "facts" are automatically suspect and if I utter things like, "2+2=4" they'll dissect in some way as to show that it's at best, "partially true." My suspicion is that those with the "oh wise one" moniker have been give that to inform "Gamitico" that they whatever they say must be at least "nearly perfectly true." But of course, I could be wrong, which, in itself, even Gamitico, must admit is "certainly and absolutely true."

And, I, therefore, get to be a "loquacious one," whatever the criteria is for that!

And, btw, I am personally glad I don't get to be a Buddy Member of any number since I really find them annoying, especially when swinging from some chandeleir.

AJ

 

[muffy.]

You swing from chandeliers too ?????

 

[Astram]

I, therefore, get to be a "loquacious one," whatever the criteria is for that!

If the criteria for that were not self-explanatory, then the title may be in error.

 

[Queen of Snacks]

I am rather appropriately titled "snack hoarder"

 

[Yavimaya]

If the criteria for that were not self-explanatory, then the title may be in error.

I just had to look up the definition for that word.... and I feel it really is a good fit!

 

[Yavimaya]

I am rather appropriately titled "snack hoarder"

I love it lol!

 

[defiantoneks]

peeking around to see if i have a title.

edit: yep, not special enough.

 

[StarLoad]

As far as I can tell, the titles seem to have a special meaning or poke at the bearer. I saw @Tauriel Dragonwood got one for her comment, so it would seem that they are both random and very specific to a user. Like the @Queen of Snacks, as it seems very appropriate.

Ed