Bethanne Rainbow
Active Member
What are your thoughts on one player having two cities in the same fellowship? Thank you in advance!
Thank you very much! I agree!I have "sister" cities in three of the four fellowships I am a part of. They are not push accounts: they hardly ever trade with each other and do not donate KP to each other's AWs unless there is a chest left that has not been taken after an announcement of chests remaining. As long as both of them are growing and contributing to the fellowship, I personally do not see a problem.
I understand some of the reasoning behind some people's hesitation, especially in regards to recruitment (two empty spots instead of one) and time away (could be detrimental to FS tourney and/or spire performance). Those are legitimate concerns and you have to decide for your fellowship if those are risks worth taking.
On the other side of the recruitment argument, I am AM of a very casual FS in Arendyll. Recruiting is difficult anyway, but more so when the type of player that would fit your group doesn't really frequent the forums or Facebook groups. We have 4 players in that FS with sister cities, and I am happy to have them. Two of the four brought their second city from another FS because they prefer the camaraderie of our group.
I respect fellowships who prefer not to have them. But having two cities in the same world does not automatically make them push accounts. Sometimes, like with me, it just means one was too impatient and too fascinated with different boost combinations in the beginning to understand that lots of cities was not a great idea long-term. And belonging to fewer fellowships means being able to give more to those fellowships in terms of the human component.