Can't you just manage this by making sure your FS members put at least two KP on your wonders? Problem solved.We need a fix for poachers who come in and put just 1 point in to get a chest, everyone hates it so why not fix it?
Oh without a doubt but the point is to get rid of the cheaters and not make extra work because some people suckCan't you just manage this by making sure your FS members put at least two KP on your wonders? Problem solved.
I don't see how this is cheating. I agree it can be annoying, but there is no rule prohibiting it. Some players give you a KP, not to "steal" a chest, but as a way of saying thank you for neighbourly help. Yes, others will do that to pick up AWKPs, but that isn't against any rule of which I am aware.Oh without a doubt but the point is to get rid of the cheaters and not make extra work because some people suck
I thought I already did thatIf we wanted to present this idea, you would have to come up with a good reason that a knowledge point donation from anyone is a bad thing before the developers would even look at it.
Okay, so if you really want to get this changed, and get to the point where we can vote on it, you will need to follow the guidelines set out here for posting suggestions.
Sounds like you want something along the lines of "establish a mechanism to limit who can contribute to AWs".
Some cons I can see already are developer time, and the need to develop a change to the overall game structure to allow a list of "friends" with specific permissions. This could be a significant lift for the developers. @helya has shared with all of us the limitations on how many ideas the CMs can forward to the devs for consideration. And these are pooled suggestions from all markets. I don't think this suggestion is going to get much traction until it is fleshed out a bit.
From my perspective, I would vote no on this. It would likely require a major change to the game for little gain. Seems like using a sledgehammer to swat a fly.
Lol yes please@Legilost ,
Here, have some free AWKP on me ..... hehehe.
Sorry I messed up and hit the wrong buttonLol yes please
You have not, you just stated that "everyone hates it"I thought I already did that
Making this fair and getting rid of a way for people that take advantage of a thing is always worth it to me but this is how I feel and why I made the post you dont have to agree that's your right and I respect itOkay, so if you really want to get this changed, and get to the point where we can vote on it, you will need to follow the guidelines set out here for posting suggestions.
Sounds like you want something along the lines of "establish a mechanism to limit who can contribute to AWs".
Some cons I can see already are developer time, and the need to develop a change to the overall game structure to allow a list of "friends" with specific permissions. This could be a significant lift for the developers. @helya has shared with all of us the limitations on how many ideas the CMs can forward to the devs for consideration. And these are pooled suggestions from all markets. I don't think this suggestion is going to get much traction until it is fleshed out a bit.
From my perspective, I would vote no on this. It would likely require a major change to the game for little gain. Seems like using a sledgehammer to swat a fly.
I actually did in a later reply by saying it would get rid of the cheaters and not make more work because some people suckYou have not, you just stated that "everyone hates it"
Without specifics on how this is a bad thing, or detrimental to the game or your progress, the developers not only will not consider it, there is 0 chance I can get the idea past the first tier of voting.