That’s how I read it, but no telling how Inno would read it.
example : The forum consensus is lets say, ohhh
we want and will pay for Cogswell Cogs.
Inno's hears this, runs it thru the corporate algorythm,
and announces : We are pleased to now offer the
community ..... Spacely Sprockets.
Now it seems clear to me that, the "cater only" view
may not something Inno wants to encourage. The problem
is..... players will always look @ the "rules/norms" and
some will say, they have a better way, or they find
dongles/workarounds within said rules. The Devs can
develop things any way they want, but they cannot force
the players to only play specific ways.
If you give players the choice between catering/fighting,
you cannot then say, but we expect you to choose fighting.
A great example is the fact the community ask'd for tools,
within thier inventory, to better find/compare/organize things.
What did we get, a search bar, just search. No organizational
options or comparison options. Its 1 step above useless, yet
thats what the Inno heard we wanted and were willing to
spend the Dev's time to add/implement. I'll still say thks
for this change, but its not really what we ask'd for.