QUOTE="Iamaita, post: 191236, member: 26852"]
I would hate a PvP anything. I like this game because it doesn’t have a PvP component, and many of the other players I have interacted with feel the same.
[/QUOTE]
The problem with PVP in other games is usually two-fold. First, the emphasis some players put upon it means they go to all sorts of sometimes questionable tactics just to "win," especially if there's a "leader board." Being #1 in some kind of fight is a natural draw for younger, mostly male players. But if you remove the ranking or impact on ranking so that it's a sort of "side game," it might work. Provided you also handle the second problem with PVP, the necessity of engaging in PVP either because you are attacked or because your score is somewhat dependent upon engaging in PVP. The second part of this has been addressed already, the first part, being forced by being attacked, is the primary reason most F2P games have a bunch of "rules" and "restrictions" about when you can be attacked. Some of them are coded, some traditions, and some even player enforced, but almost all F2P games with PVP find it necessary to restrict PVP in some manner.
So the thing is, PVP that is completely voluntary and not necessary for ranking or anything else, would be fine. Once you put out a ranking or make it necessary to ranking or in defense, you can probably kiss a lot of players here good bye. And I'd be one of them.
AJ