Only one of these statements are correct.
- A spreadsheet approach is a cooperative venture that ALLOWS folks to contribute a variable number of points, and nicely fits the 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32 rounded down to a multiple of 5, AND the round robin distribution of shards.
- If you read that quote in context, the Skip a Day and Eternal Contribution Tread approaches are horrible. Eight Days per week is merely awful.
- The Eight Days per Week model is self-documenting and it's much easier to manage than the other rotational models, particularly when you need to add or drop folks out of the rotation.
Ancient Wonders DO need a history tab, but if folks simply respond in kind then they awards are nicely balanced, and swap agreements naturally follow.
The point of the analysis is that
the various rotational model, THEMSELVES, are what causes the trouble. Rotational models, all of them, are misguided efforts that do far more harm than good.
If you're using a spreadsheet model, or simply ignoring the entire issue of Ancient Wonder contributions, then folks can contribute at various levels, awards are distributed proportionally, and things hum along quite nicely. I manage a 40 member Forge Point group in FoE, that averages around 2000 contributed points per day, and I've been doing so for a couple of years now. It's the core activity in our guild.