shimmerfly
Well-Known Member
We sure are an opinionated group!
I'm not saying that's wrong...btw.
I'm not saying that's wrong...btw.
No, but I am. Please a civil conversation even when we disagree is fine, but let us not start with rude and disrespectful comments towards each other.
We trade goods for goods the only time we don’t is when we go to wholesaler and buy goods with either gold or supplies. An auction to be would be using gold instead of goods to require goods.It sort of makes me cross when folks think dumbing something down is a good solution.
Trading is downright boring when everybody in the Fellowship has a half-million of everything, cross-trades are forbidden, folks filter for Fellowship, and then power-click all the trades.
What's next? Maybe an Auto-Win for Spire if you have a gazillion goods?
A healthy auction-based market would be far more interesting. Sellers post a minimum acceptable bid and an immediate sell price. After 24 hours:
Adding a bid capability to our existing system would be pretty straight-forward; it's just a deferred purchase. Worlds of Warcraft and several other games use auction systems.
- It's already gone at the sell price
- Highest bid wins
- There were no bids so it's returned to the seller, minus a small fee.
An even more interesting approach is a Dutch Auction, but it's probably too complicated for casual buyers. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dutchauction.asp
To all of those who think filters aren't necessary: who of you want to replace all those sentient goods I just lost because I accidentally picked up a big zero star sentient trade???
I was playing on computer, picking up 2 star same-tier trades but then I ran out of the goods asked for and the trades switched order and I clicked before realizing it was the wrong trade
Barter Auctions work just fine, BUT I do prefer your idea of permitting Wholesale Cross-Tier Trades. It's a nice simple approach.An auction to be would be using gold instead of goods to require goods.
The solution for the cross trading could be solved by allowing three tiers of goods to be used in all tier groups of the wholesaler.
This exactly.To all of those who think filters aren't necessary: who of you want to replace all those sentient goods I just lost because I accidentally picked up a big zero star sentient trade???
I was playing on computer, picking up 2 star same-tier trades but then I ran out of the goods asked for and the trades switched order and I clicked before realizing it was the wrong trade
Yep. one mouse-stutter last night cost me a whack of Soap for velvet I didn't need
That information is available once you complete the tutorial.are there 9 sentient & 9 ascended goods ??
along with the , duhhhhh , 9 basic goods.....
And some players like me don't have an issue with it.
Well........ it might hurt purveyors of turdy comestibles.Does adding this option hurt you in any way shape or form? No? What's your objection then? No one should have things that you don't want?
Our point is that it does sometimes bring change.Soggy I have already stated I have no objection to a filter, so get off your high horse. I know it was suggested and rejected if my memory is right so Make a new suggestion and be done with it. Having a discussion here will not bring about change.
Ed
If the devs were reading these threads, which I doubt they are IMO, they would see that there is a number that get offended by just seeing cross-trades and a number that doesn't care. so they are not incentivized to make a change. Again send in a suggestion and see if it gets changed is allOur point is that it does sometimes bring change.
Absolutely not. I enjoy a spirited debate. I may not be making my point clearly.And as for ignoring the thread and not participating with dissent or otherwise, I take it from your and Soggy's comments that you would rather have an echo chamber of replies agreeing with each other.
So this discussion is actually leading somewhere, and isn't pointless?Well said Enevhar. Sounds like you should make that a suggestion.....
Please tell me where I told Soggy to just ignore, anything because I don't see it? Nor Did I say Soggy was wasting his time? And I did not say nothing will change.I find it amusing that you took the time to tell Soggy they should just ignore things that bother them, then went on to say that Soggy is wasting their time taking the time to tell other people about things that bother them because nothing will change.
Couple of pages back I said make a suggestion about it, and I still font see one.So this discussion is actually leading somewhere, and isn't pointless?