mucksterme
Oh Wise One
This is a competitive game
I'd love to hear why you think so..
This is a competitive game
I'd love to hear why you think so..
No, because the comparison stands. Some people are randomly selected to get extremely valuable gifts from Ellen, often tens of thousands of dollars. Nobody thinks they have the right to have the producers to explain to them why or how those selections were made. Not even the sponsors, who spend hundreds of thousands of dollars for commericals and supports for the show.
The advantage gained from the production speed up was trivial in the context of the game. At best, someone who took maximum advantage got to run their productions 24 times instead of 9, if they had enough supplies to do so, because it didn't reduce the cost of the jobs, just the time they took to execute. Anyone who wanted that could have used diamonds to complete 24 consecutive productions one hour apart and got the same benefit. I'll repeat, the result was a trivial benefit in the context of the game. I didn't get it and don't care in the least. People need thicker skins.
To pretend that a game is competitive when the player willing to spend the most money always has the highest score reflects a deep seated sense of either confusion or entitlement.And my comparison to Jeopardy stands.
The game is only competitive to those who are willing to spend money. No-one else can possibly compete, and the majority of us are not competing with those peopleWhy does the game keep a ratings chart for both fellowships and players? That in itself makes it competitive. I realize that might not matter to a lot of players, but to many it does.
Two extra 'days' worth of production isn't even a half of a percent of the time I've been playing.
Belittling other people's use of language is tone with or without emotion, and can doubly affect the perceptions of other people when our own use of language is bad in spite of that attempted criticism.
What do they need to explain that hasn't already been explained? They're testing a new feature. They don't owe anyone any explanation just because some people don't like that, and just because some people don't like it doesn't make it a mistake.
What do they need to explain that hasn't already been explained? They're testing a new feature. They don't owe anyone any explanation just because some people don't like that, and just because some people don't like it doesn't make it a mistake.
Your right. *cringe*there is nothing better on Facebook than....
I should hate you both, but you'd only thrive on it.Your right.
" if people want to be taken serious they should check there grammer before clicking reply"
"There, Their, They're. Don't sweat being a grammar Nazi" It will drive you crazy, especially on Facebook