The quote is about people that don't stand up to a wrong, unless it affects them directly.
Wrong. The Devs did not 'put' anyone anywhere. The battle difficulty is determined by the chapter they are in and how far outside of that chapter they have conquered.They wrote it so that when a person is in a place where the devs arbitrarily put them the battles are impossible. Not more difficult. Impossible. Not winnable. Therefore, that line is incorrect. It is poorly placed. It is harmful. It is bad for keeping customers.
Yes BobbyKitty words DO have meaning. Especially when one puts those words into the proper context they were used in. You arbitrarily assigning that word the disingenuous definition based on your false narrative. I NEVER, EVER chastised a player for over scouting or over conquering. You can try all the double talk you want. Your definition is not/was not correct. That was what YOU took out of it, not what I inferred or implied.Words have meaning. You can try to post as many alternative meanings of the word "should" as you want, but either what you said is utter gibberish, since those meanings don't apply, or you are pouncing. Jumping on someone and telling them that they are not "supposed" to be able to play a part of the game they did before is piling on them.
Forum status??? What does that even mean? What have I been proven wrong about, please quote specific posts so I know areas that I need to improve upon.
Do you think the devs are never going to release new content with new troop upgrades??? They designed this new system specifically so they can easily add more troops into the game. With that, yes your current troops will continue to receive upgrades as well. Look at the current chapters, you always get upgrades...
With the way the current system is designed, you are trying to fight in provinces that were designed for chapters that have not been released yet. Prove me wrong there, I dare you
However, I wonder what the point is.
As Bobbykitty mentioned, the point is, the more constructive feedback about the game complied in one place on one thread, the more likely changes can be made based on the feedback. Everyone is more than welcome to come to the forum and offer feedback. We want to hear from more players
THAT is the sum total of your contribution to the thread/forum ??? That is sadder than sad.
Yeah, right. We are more than welcome to come to the Forum and express our opinion. BUT, we are constantly heckled by a group of INNO drones, even here in a forum. Sure we get to complain but it does as much good as asking Support. You want to hear from the players as they leave in droves?
Has there ever been this much of an outcry (of FOUL) before?
This is mild. Go back and look at the huffing and puffing that occurred when the Scouting Chests were introduced. The other half of the folks, including myself were pretty unhappy, because we were denied our pet strategy of avoiding the acquisition of province until they could be smashed.Has there ever been this much of an outcry (of FOUL) before?
Experience is something that you usually get right after you needed it.they are talking about things that people without that experience have not experienced.
But if the line has been moved closer to the "middle" of the game, that's still balancing. They'll still be ahead of the pack, but not SO far ahead.If players continue to negotiate, then that situation will not self correct. They will always be ahead of the imaginary line.
Look up epistemology some time. Consensus is not proof, and we don't even have consensus.your statements have been quickly proven to be false. By several posters.
You are fighting in provinces that by the games design are meant to conquered in Wood Elves or beyond. You are currently in Fairies.
All you want is to commiserate about how badly you got screwed over by the new set up. You did, you totally did, so did others
Why do you keep acting as if the devs are gods and whatever they do is what it is. Meant to be?
This nonsense about being "too far ahead" is hurting the game.
The developers obviously have spreadsheets that project well into the future, and the basic problem was that the battleship was already leaking badly, and IT WAS GETTING WORSE. To focus in on one single aspect, 12 units were being added for each new Squad Size research. As a consequence, it was becoming more and more likely that a skillful fighter would be able to advance SEVERAL chapters beyond where he was expected to be. By changing the formula to 6 + 3 time the squad size technology level, the increase becomes geometric and "harder" now means a reasonable percentage harder for each new chapter, rather than "harder" by a decreasing percentage.The devs wrote it so that when a person is that far ahead of where they should be, the battles are more difficult.
In fact it's the very soul of a city builder. It's naive to think that you can push the game out of shape, well beyond what the developers anticipated and PROBABLY well beyond what they even thought was possible, and THEN complain when they plug the leak. FORCING the developers to improve the game should be a BADGE OF HONOR. Flouncing around and BRAGGING about how advanced you are/were just diminishes your achievement.He gets it, he just hates it and thinks it sucks. And there is nothing wrong with that.
They designed this new system specifically so they can easily add more troops into the game.
The developers are addressing a problem that was getting WORSE. The patient will recover, and will be healthier and happier as a consequence.But not huge changes that destroy the game of so many people in one fell swoop.
You just havn't been reading the forums for very long. Bobbykitty and I have been going back and forth about playing the game "efficiently" since forever.there was no mention of too many people having played too well and fought into provinces for chapters that hadn't been designed yet so now they were going to be smacked for playin
Sure they have. It's just that you're still on the "advanced" side of the teeter-totter. Perhaps they didn't balance "your" game, but the entire point of the revamp was to ensure that future players would be looking at a better behaved game.The Developers have not balanced the Battle as they promised
I dare say there would be many other options available to the devs if they truly wanted to make the game balanced, alas we got stuck with this one
Why not just do it right in the first place? I'd rather get it done and over with, rather than dying of a million incremental changes.Why can INNO GAMES not just modify their new battle system to at least make the battling a little more fair: perhaps reducing the difficulty a little?
And therein lies the problem. You're devoting MORE time to a single instance of the game than the game can bear.Now I find I am stifled. On the US server I have only 1 world I play in
There's nothing especially wrong with wanting to be on top. Some people prefer allowing the developers to set their goals.There will always be players who are stuck. Mostly those top players in every world who seem to buy themselves through every chapter with sheer unlimited funds, but that has nothing to do with playing, just with wanting to be in the top.
HERE IS THE FRUSTRATIONS WITH THE GAME. on behalf of all of my fellowship 25 members of the number 1 ranked fellowship ARENDYLLI do understand your frustrations with the game (I play too) and I would like help by getting all the feedback from everyone seen by the right people. The dev team have already listened on more than one occasion and have made changes using that feedback. I am very sorry that many players have been halted by the recent changes.
So, people who are unhappy can speak, but players who like the new battle system shouldn't speak? Good luck with that.Yeah, right. We are more than welcome to come to the Forum and express our opinion. BUT, we are constantly heckled by a group of INNO drones, even here in a forum.
And therein lies the problem. You're devoting MORE time to a single instance of the game than the game can bear.