DeletedUser9601
Guest
OP: get gud, newb
Edit: also, l2p
Edit: also, l2p
Harder as in "Harder to get the same points as before"
In the late game half of the chapters give you no increase to barracks levels where most troops come from, and they all have 3 mandatory SS techs.
But don't they give you 4x levels for military buildings then, even if every 2 chapters - comparing to previous 2x every chapter? This makes it more chunky, but I find that I've got benefit first, and then give it up slowly as the chapters progress - until the next level upgrade.Harder as in "Harder to get the same points as before"
In the late game half of the chapters give you no increase to barracks levels where most troops come from, and they all have 3 mandatory SS techs.
If you progress quickly through the chapters without a lot of techlock then your military AW increases will be outstripped by those SS increases.
Exactly, so 50% of the time it feels like it's harder to do the same because you used up all of the barracks upgrade in the previous chapter.The only thing that you should significantly notice is the off-chapter effect
Right but no one remembers the easy stuff. It's just like how a player will complain that they didn't get a building after 25 spins but they'll never mention it when they won a building 3 spins in a row.I was amazed at how much easier it made all the tournaments.
You can only accurately compare 9 weeks apart. Scrolls is much harder than say Steel. Much of it has to do with range and initiative.my Troops are showing significant losses & significantly more than just 3 weeks ago.
Yep, they tick both boxesany tourney with MistWalkers is harder
Hey! Some of us gloat all the time. I specifically remember as early as the King flurry event, Gloating about my 11 Winter Gardens.It's just like how a player will complain that they didn't get a building after 25 spins but they'll never mention it when they won a building 3 spins in a row.
Fully agree. Small correction though, most 10-chest teams, in my experience, would want to see at least 1000 points as a 4 week average, preferably more. Exceptions can be made for people who are clearly hampered by weak FS.It's difficult, but if your desire for tournament success is strong, then you have to pull the trigger and find a better team. If you are consistently scoring 500+ in tournaments, and willing to try for 1500, then almost any motivated team will welcome you
That's why I specified willing to try for 1500. In early chapters, it's hard to score much more than that because you just don't have enough open provinces. A player entering Chapter 5 who is following the suggested expansion rate only has about 8 of each type of province open. If they are getting about 500 every week, they are probably committed and worth carrying for a few weeks as they expand.Fully agree. Small correction though, most 10-chest teams, in my experience, would want to see at least 1000 points as a 4 week average, preferably more. Exceptions can be made for people who are clearly hampered by weak FS.
Fully agree. Small correction though, most 10-chest teams, in my experience, would want to see at least 1000 points as a 4 week average, preferably more. Exceptions can be made for people who are clearly hampered by weak FS.
@Seachant
And your FS averaged about 7K in the last 3 tournaments. With 24 members averaging more than 100K ranking points each. How's that even possible? No disrespect, but 7K is how much a single very strong player can get, or just 2 decent ones. So yeah, with that level of FS participation you won't get far.
I did take a look at your city. You're in S&D, but haven't implemented 4 barracks upgrades from Woodelves. I can tell you that going from L21 to L25 made a huge difference in troops production. You also don't have any military AWs, and craftable temporary military boosters make a big difference in the outcomes. Extensive catering in later chapters will definitely bankrupt you.
Seachant - - I can honestly say I've used some of your comments VERBATIM as I'm getting slaughtered as well. Thank you sooo much for posting your comments, it's nice to know someone really gets what I'm talking about. Heh-Heh, I'm sorry for your losses. ;-)I have in the last few months of tourneys, suddenly found myself having my rear-end handed to me by level 1 and 2 troops with smaller squad sizes, VS my lvl 3 larger squads..*To the point that they literally decimate me*
I have honestly been floored as to how bad I have been trounced in some of the battles, and I am often in top 3-4 when tourney ends, so I do fight a lot, and have been for quite some time, so i understand formation, squad blend ETC..just like today b4 I logged in here, I started tourney and have only opened a page and half, and am already nearly out of troops and using mass supplies to get KP (UGH)
Like others here, I will no longer as of last Tourney bankrupt myself either, as I have been doing that a lot due to troop imbalance, and wanting to help out the Fellowship. which simply put is not worth it since so few are participating that we never make it past 6th chest, which really stinks because I really need the 10th for magic upgrades :-( (not disparaging my other members that put a LOT into it btw)
I do see where the o.p. is coming from, and we have also had several other long time players in the group commenting on this for a while now.
Sorry for any typo's, on a tiny screen right now..
SC
You can only accurately compare 9 weeks apart. . .
Tournament types cycle over 9 weeks, as there are 9 relics. So 9 weeks ago we had another scrolls tournament.Just curious, how do you calculate "9 weeks" for your statement (i.e. - how is it any different than 6, 8, 10 weeks, etc.)?
Everyone is getting slaughtered, this is the nature of the scrolls tournament. Don't remember people complaining when they were cruising through the steel tournament a few weeks agoSeachant - - I can honestly say I've used some of your comments VERBATIM as I'm getting slaughtered as well. Thank you sooo much for posting your comments, it's nice to know someone really gets what I'm talking about. Heh-Heh, I'm sorry for your losses. ;-)