SoggyShorts
Mathematician par Excellence
I'm really not trying to start an arguement, I'm just trying to look at things objectively rather than emotionally.You now are putting up a non-sensical argument just for the sake of arguing.
I have read every single post on the US and Beta forums on this subject, I'm just not convinced that the forums represent the playerbase. Those that got hurt by the change are way more likely to post, and even if someone who was happy with the 25% more goods they are getting considered posting that here, they very likely would not for fear of being attacked.Look at all the topics on this forum. And go ask people on the map.
There are SEVERAL people saying the number of visits stayed the same.
There are SEVERAL MORE people saying the number of visits dropped
There are NO people saying the number went up.
1. Someone uses a tiny amount of data to come to a conclusion.On this topic you consistently say there is not enough data available (on which I agree) then start arguing from assumptions.
2. I point out that they may not have enough data.
3. I use a tiny amount of data that would lead to the opposite conclusion.
#3 is just a method to reinforce #2.
I try to keep the "increased" visits as separate from "increased goods" claims from inno. While I can come up with possible theories why the total goods gained from CL/BS worldwide may increase for "most" players, anything I come up with for increased visits is a much bigger reach.On the other hand, Dhurrin is right that nobody should b able to claim with a straight face that these are going to increase neighborly help.
Last edited: